Method for treating an inflammatory pathological condition

ABSTRACT

The present invention relates to a method for treating an inflammatory pathological condition in a patient in need thereof, comprising administering on empty stomach an anti-inflammatory effective amount of 2-methoxyphenyl-1-methyl-5p-methylbenzoyl-pyrrol-2-acetamido acetate (known also as amtolmetin guacyl and indicated in the present description also as MED 15).

This is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 08/679807, filed on Jul. 15, 1996.

The present invention relates to a method for treating an inflammatory pathological condition in a patient in need thereof, comprising administering on empty stomach an anti-inflammatory effective amount of 2-methoxyphenyl-1-methyl-5p-methylbenzoyl-pyrrol-2-acetamido acetate (known also as amtolmetin guacyl and indicated in the present description also as MED 15).

BACKGROUND ART

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been used for many years in therapy. It is also well known that NSAIDs produce lesions to gastrointestinal apparatus depending on the length of the treatment and on the type of drug. This problem has a dramatic importance in cases where the therapy must be protracted for a long time. An example is rheumatoid arthritis in old people, where a chronic treatment is needed to keep under control the inflammatory state and the pain and make acceptable the quality of life.

At present there is a pharmacological dogma establishing a mandatory connection between anti-inflammatory effect and gastric lesions. This dogma has been recently shaken by the availability of newly synthesised anti-inflammatory drugs showing gastrolesive effects lower than those of old ones. Notwithstanding that equiactive doses of drug could produce lesions of different seriousness, it was settled that an anti-inflammatory drug showed, in any case, a gastrolesive effect. From this fact it followed that it could not be expected that these drugs known in the art could show a gastroprotective effect.

It is also well known, and this has a pharmacological relevance too, that the administration of NSAIDs reflects negatively on renal function, in particular by provoking a remarkable decrease in diuresis. This effect is due to prostaglandin blockade; in fact, prostaglandin physiologically dilate the renal vascular system. The blocking effects of traditional NSAIDs lead to vasoconstriction and to the consequent inhibition of diuresis. From this fact it followed that it could not be expected that these drugs known in the art could be administered without negatively affecting the renal function.

Even more so in view of the above, it could not be expected that a NSAID could simultaneously show a gastroprotective effect without negatively affecting the renal function while at the same time maintaining a high anti-inflammatory activity.

It is also well known that in view of their side-effects on gastric mucosa, NSAIDs are invariably administered after meals or, in general, when the stomach is not empty. The generality of this pharmacological principle finds a practical confirmation in the recommendations found in the packagings of the drugs in commerce. Basically the idea is that the effects of the hypersecretion of hydrochloric acid provoked by the administration of NSAIDs may be, at least partially, counteracted by the presence of food.

It has been now surprisingly found that the compound 2-methoxyphenyl-1-methyl-5p-methylbenzoyl-pyrrol-2-acetamido acetate, which is an effective anti-inflammatory non-steroidal drug as already known in the art, shows a remarkable antisecretory activity on gastric secretion in mammals without affecting the renal function, but, on the contrary, increasing the diuresis. This increase in diuresis is linked to its mechanism of action; in fact, the overflow of neuropeptides (in particular CGRP) produced in the stomach by MED 15 and flowing from the stomach into the bloodstream, produces renal capillary vasodilatation, with reversal of its effect on prostaglandin.

Additionally, and more than unexpectedly for a NSAID, it has been found that amtolmetin guacyl, in order to show its efficacy (gastroprotection and renal tolerability together with an anti-inflammatory effect unchanged), has to be administered on empty stomach in view of the peculiarity of its action mechanism.

The compound 2-methoxyphenyl-1-methyl-5p-methylbenzoyl-pyrrol-2-acetamido acetate is already known in the art and is for instance disclosed in Italian patent application no. 47881A/82 and in U.S. Pat. No. 4,578,481 issued on Mar. 25, 1986.

Both the documents of the state of the art disclose that the above compound shows anti-inflammatory, analgesic, antipyretic, antitussive and antisecretive (on the mucus of the respiratory airway) properties. No mention, either direct or indirect, is made about a possible antisecretive effect on the gastric secretion in mammals.

It is therefore the subject matter of the present invention a method for treating an inflammatory pathological condition in a patient in need thereof, comprising administering on empty stomach an anti-inflammatory effective amount of 2-methoxyphenyl-1-methyl-5p-methylbenzoyl-pyrrol-2-acetamido acetate.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

With the present description are enclosed eighteen sheets of drawings in which:

FIGS. 1, 2, 3 and 4 show the "in vivo" effect of amtolmetin guacyl on gastric acid secretion of the rat, using as an agonist histamine, carbachol, gastrin and peptone, respectively;

FIG. 5 shows the effect of amtolmetin guacyl on the H₂ -receptors of the guinea pig isolated atrium; the stimulation was produced by histamine;

FIG. 6 shows the effect of amtolmetin guacyl on gastric bicarbonate secretion in the rat, using histamine as a stimulating agent;

FIGS. 7 and 8 show the antispasmodic effect of amtolmetin guacyl on guinea pig isolated ileum, using as a stimulating agent histamine and acetylcholine (cumulative curves);

FIG. 9 shows the antispasmodic effect of amtolmetin guacyl on guinea pig isolated ileum, using as a stimulating agent serotonin;

FIGS. 10 and 11 show the effect of amtolmetin guacyl on gastric motility in the rat, using respectively increasing doses of acetylcholine and serotonin, while

FIG. 12 shows the dose-effect relationship of amtolmetin guacyl on gastric motility in the rat;

FIG. 13 shows the effect of amtolmetin guacyl and of diclofenac on rat diuresis;

FIG. 14 shows the effect of amtolmetin guacyl on peptone-stimulated gastric acid secretion in the rat following treatment with CGRP₈₋₃₇ ;

FIG. 15 shows a comparison among the molecular structures of capsaicin, nonanoyl vanillylamide and amtolmetin guacyl;

FIG. 16 shows the effects of amtolmetin guacyl on peptone-stimulated gastric acid secretion in the rat following treatment with capsazepine;

FIG. 17 shows the interference of diphenhydramine on gastroprotective action of amtolmetin guacyl in the rat; and

FIG. 18 shows interference of diphenhydramine on the effect of amtolmetin guacyl on peptone-stimulated gastric acid secretion in the rat.

CHEMISTRY

The molecule of amtolmetin guacyl was synthesised using modern chemical technology now known as "Combinatorial Chemistry". This neologism was coined in the United States as recently as 1993, but the technique was known years before. This new synthetic chemistry technique consists in combining molecular species bioactive in themselves, to obtain molecules which possess pharmacological properties totally different from those of the single starting components. Traditionally, a staring molecule was manipulated through the substitution of a number of radicals, now the procedure is less random and starts from molecular moieties which are pharmacologically active per se (Combinatorial Chemistry, Editorial Feb. 12, 1996, C&EN). The amtolmetin guacyl molecule was born this way, producing a drug with completely new characteristics, totally different from the bioactivity of the various moieties.

While the production and characterisation of the compound amtolmetin guacyl are disclosed in the above mentioned US and Italian documents which are hereby incorporated for reference, in the following 1) the results of pharmacological tests showing the antisecretive activity and 2) the pharmacotoxicological profile and 3) the mechanism of action of the above compound and 4) clinics are reported.

1) Pharmacological tests showing the antisecretive activity on animals.

Chemicals and animals used

The following substances have been used: carboxymethylcellulose sodium, histamine dichloride, piroxicam, carrageenin and acetylcholine chloride produced by Sigma Chimica (Milano, Italy); cimetidine produced by Farchemia (Milano, Italy); 2-methoxyphenyl-1-methyl-5p-methylbenzoyl-pyrrol-2-acetamido acetate and naproxen produced by Alfa Chemicals Italiana (Bergamo, Italia); diclofenac sodium, nimesulide and tolmetin produced by LCM Trading (Milano, Italy); gastrin produced by Fluka Chimica (Milano, Italy). Male Wistar rats, 250±10 g b.w. (Charles River, Calco, Como, Italy), quarantined for five days prior to the beginning of the trial and divided into groups of 3 animals per cage, were used for determination of gastric lesions and of ID₅₀ determination. Immature male Wistar rats, 30-45 g b.w. (Harlan Nossan, Milano) were used for the determination of the antisecretory effect on isolated rat stomach. The guinea-pigs used were the Dunkin Hartley guinea-pigs (Harlan Nossan, Milano, Italy).

The animals were fed standard laboratory chow with free access to water under animal house conditions of 22±2° C. temperature, relative humidity 55±10% and 12-h light-dark cycle.

Determination of gastric lesions

In this first test the effect of the compound 2-methoxyphenyl-1-methyl-5p-methylbenzoyl-pyrrol-2-acetamido acetate and of some reference NSAIDs (diclofenac sodium, naproxene, nimesulide, piroxicam and tolmetin) on the gastric mucosa of rat after repeated oral administration in order to test the existence and extent of the gastric lesions, has been verified.

The animals entered in the trial, randomized and divided into groups of 6 rats each, were fasted for 16 h prior to treatment, with access to water ad libitum. They were re-fed 1 h after drug administration. The compound 2-methoxyphenyl-1-methyl-5p-methylbenzoyl-pyrrol-2-acetamido acetate and the other reference NSAIDs, suspended in 1% carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) solution, were orally administered by gastric gavage in a volume of 6 ml/kg for four consecutive days. Controls received the vehicle in the same way as the treated animals. 4 h after the last administration the animals were killed by ether overdose; the stomachs were removed, rinsed with 10 ml of saline and immersed in 1% formalin. They were later opened along the greater curvature and the mucosa examined for lesions.

The seriousness of the lesion was quantified according to a scale graduated from 1 to 3 according to the size of the lesions: 1=ulcer<1 mm; 2=ulcer 1-2 mm; 3=ulcer>2 mm. The total sum was divided by 10 to obtain the "erosion index". The gastric lesions were evaluated by two independent investigators under blind conditions according to Main & Whittle method (BJ Pharmac 1975:53; p. 217-224).

Since pharmacological studies in carrageenin-induced paw oedema in rat show that a daily 50 mg/kg dose in oral administration of 2-methoxyphenyl-1-methyl-5p-methylbenzoyl-pyrrol-2-acetamido acetate is higly efficacious as anti-inflammatory agent, this daily dose has been selected for the evaluation of the gastric lesions of same compound. Since the average daily dose in man (for the anti-inflammatory activity) is 600 mg, the comparative efficacious dose in the rat is in the ratio of 12:1. More precisely, comparative evaluation with the other NSAID compounds was calculated as follows:

    600 mg/day: 50 mg/kg=daily dose of reference NSAID in man: X

where X represents the daily dose of the reference NSAID in rat. This criterion keeps into account the "real" activity ratio in man. In this work the "ratio to rat dosage" has also been included which keeps into account ratios homogeneous to the same animal species. To evaluate the "ratio to rat dosage" the ID₅₀ has been determined using the carrageenin-induced oedema as inflammatory test. This made possible to determine in rat an equiactive dose which is, consequently, comparable among the various compared NSAIDs.

Determination of ID₅₀

ID₅₀, relative to the products under examination (considered in table 1), has been evaluated using the anti-inflammatory response to carrageenin-induced paw oedema (according to Wong et al, J Pharmacol Exp, 1973:1855; pages 127-138). The products, suspended in 1% CMC, were administered orally in a total volume of 5 ml/rat. 1 h later, 0.1 ml of 1% carrageenin sterile solution was injected into the hind subplantar aponeurosis. Volume of the paw was measured immediately prior to injection of the phlogogen and 2 h thereafter, by means of a plethysmograph. The percentage of inhibition of oedema was calculated as follows:

    ΔV treated/ΔV control×100                1

where ΔV=final V-initial V.

Three doses have been used for each NSAID and the ID₅₀, which indicates the quantity in mg/kg inhibiting oedema by 50%, has been determined.

The results are listed in the following table 1, where each expressed value is the average of 6 determinations. In this table the results either of the so-called "ratio to human dosage" and of the "ratio to rat dosage" are listed.

                  TABLE 1     ______________________________________     Comparison of the effects of amtolmetin guacyl     and reference compounds on the rat gastric     mucosa following repeated oral administration              Ratio             Ratio to              to human Gastro-  rat dosage                                          Gastro-              dosage   lesive   (mg/kg)   lesive     DRUG     (mg/kg)  index    (ID.sub.50 mg/kg × 5)                                          index     ______________________________________     Controls --       1.0      --        1.0     amtolmetin              50.0     1.0      100       1.0     guacyl     Diclofenac              7.5      68.1.sup.a)                                15.8      63.7     sodium     Naproxen 37.5.sup.b)                       273.8.sup.c)                                34.0      283.7     Nimesulide              16.6     21.3     28.5      46.2     Piroxicam              2.0      31.3     13.8      176.2     Tolmetin.sup.d)              --       --       61.2.sup.d)                                          79.7     ______________________________________      Each value is the mean of 6 rats.      .sup.a) Diffuse haemorrhagic gastritis was also present      .sup.b) Naproxen was taken at the lowest dosage used in man (450 mg/day)      .sup.c) One animal died after the third treatment and two showed extremel      thin stomach walls      .sup.d) Tolmetin was administered at an equimolar dose compared to      amtolmetin guacyl

In order to exacerbate possible side effects on the stomach the dosage of amtolmetin guacyl was quadruplicated. Results are reported in Table 2.

                  TABLE 2     ______________________________________     Effects of a high dosage of amtolmetin guacyl     compared to controls                       Rats with               Dose    lesions/   Erosion                                        Gastrolesive     Groups    (mg/kg) rats used  index index     ______________________________________     Controls  --      2/6        0.066 1.0     MED15     200     2/6        0.066 1.0     ______________________________________

MED15 (amtolmetin guacyl) was administered for 4 consecutive days by oral gavage

In order to obtain a histological evaluation of the results obtained in our laboratories, an independent laboratory was provided with identical samples of the material evaluated by us, under totally blind conditions.

                  TABLE 3     ______________________________________     Observation of mucosal lesions in intact stomach                    Microscopic                              Macroscopic     Nr.  Drug      findings  findings                                      Histology     ______________________________________     2    MED15     0         0       no histological lesions     3              0         0       no histological lesions     4              0         0       no histological lesions     5    Diclofenac                    2*        2       *multiple areas of     6              3*        4       necrotic mucosal     7              9*        7       ulceration extending                                      through the gastric                                      foveola, not involving                                      the glandular region     8    Tolmetin  2+        3       +small, superficial     9              0+        0       necrotic ulcers     10             1+        0       extending through the                                      gastric foveola, not                                      involving the                                      intrafoveolar stroma     ______________________________________

Rats were treated with amtolmetin guacyl by oral gavage (50 mg/kg); diclofenac (7.5 mg/kg); tolmetin (66.6 mg/kg).

Histological evaluation of the state of the mucosa of variously-treated rats are reported in Table 4.

                  TABLE 4     ______________________________________     Histological effect of repeated administration     of MED15 (amtolmetin guacyl) and reference     compounds (ratio to rat dosage)     Animal     n.    Drug     Macroscopic findings                                   Histology     ______________________________________     1     Tolmetin ulcer of the corpus                                   1-3 mm areas of                                   coagulative necrosis                                   involving entire                                   mucosal thickness     4              2 ulcers of the corpus                                   1-3 mm areas of                                   coagulative necrosis                                   involving entire                                   mucosal thickness     3              8 small ulcers >1 mm areas of cellular                                   necrosis extending                                   through two-thirds of                                   the mucosa (surface                                   epithelium, region of                                   mucous neck cells and                                   of parietal cells)     5              multiple dark lesions                                   >1 mm areas of cellular                                   necrosis extending                                   through two-thirds of                                   the mucosa (surface                                   epithelium, region of                                   mucous neck cells and                                   of parietal cells)     2, 6           normal         no histological lesions     7, 8, 9,           MED15     10, 11,        normal         no histological lesions     12     13    Controls normal         2 areas of necrosis <1                                   mm diameter involving                                   entire mucosal thickness                                   no histological lesions     14, 15         normal         no histological lesions     16, 17           Diclofenac                    multiple tiny ulcers                                   2 areas of coagulative                                   necrosis involving                                   entire mucosal thickness     18, 19         mucosal ulcers multiple areas of                                   coagulative necrosis                                   extending through two-                                   thirds of the mucosa     20, 21         normal         no histological lesions     ______________________________________

Rats were treated with amtolmetin guacyl by oral gavage (100 mg/kg), diclofenac (15.8 mg/kg) and tolmetin (61.2 mg/kg) in CMC 1% for 4 consecutive days. Controls received the vehicle only, also by oral gavage. 4 h after the final administration the animals were killed by ether overdose and the stomachs removed, rinsed in saline and immersed in formalin 4%.

The histological results confirmed what we had previously seen with the dissection microscope; the difference between amtolmetin guacyl and the other NSAIDs appeared enormous. In particular, it was emphasized the better aspect of the gastric mucosa of some of the stomachs (which were revealed to be those of amtolmetin guacyl and had also been observed in our laboratories) (b.r. No.17). This difference between amtolmetinguacyl and the controls piloted us towards research of possible gastro-protective effects of the molecule. The question posed was whether the product in some way influenced the gastric acid secretion which is well known to be at the basis of NSAID-induced gastric damage.

Antisecretive Activity in Vitro in the Rat

At the beginning, the isolated, perfused, immature rat stomach, treated externally with the study product, was used. We preferred to use the isolated stomach in toto rather than strips (B.R. No. 18, 19 and 20) in order not to exclude a section of the stomach (the antrum), unimportant for acid secretion but very important for the secretion of bicarbonates and bioactive peptides (b.r. No. 21, 22). The results were encouraging, since amtolmetin guacyl inhibited acid production stimulated by the three classic agonists (histamine, acetilcholine and gastrin) both using varying doses of agonist or varying doses of amtolmetin guacyl (Table 5).

                                      TABLE 5     __________________________________________________________________________     Effect of MED15 (amtolmetin guacyl) on gastric secretion of the rat in     vitro     n.  Agonist  Δacid                        n°                            Antagonist                                    Δacid                                          %     anims.         (M)      (nmol/min)                        anims.                            (M)     (nmol/min)                                          inhib.                                             P     __________________________________________________________________________     23  Histamine 10.sup.-4                  51.3 ± 6.4                        11  MED15 10.sup.-4                                    19.2 ± 5.4                                          62.6                                             0.003                        6   MED15 10.sup.-5                                    16.1 ± 5.4                                          68.7                                             0.010     7   Histamine 10.sup.-3                  42.3 ± 4.9                        5   MED15 10.sup.-4                                    17.9 ± 2.1                                          57.7                                             0.003     8   Histamine 10.sup.-4                   67.0 ± 17.8                        5   Cimetidine 10.sup.-4                                    14.3 ± 7.2                                          78.6                                             0.047     6   Acetylcholine 10.sup.-3                  90.2 ± 6.5                        6   MED15 10.sup.-4                                    71.2 ± 5.4                                          21.5                                             0.050     10  Gastrin 6 × 10.sup.-7                  64.0 ± 5.6                        6   MED15 10.sup.-4                                    30.7 ± 3.7                                          52.1                                             0.0001     __________________________________________________________________________

The results are expressed as mean±S.E.

The comparison with cimetidine, known antiulcer drug, with similar values is a further confirmation of the effectiveness of the antisecretory activity of amtolmetin guacyl.

Antisecretory Activity in Vivo in Rat

At this point we wished to confirm these results in vivo in a stomach model (b.r. No. 23), maintaining all of nervous and vascular connections intact.

The methods used were those described by G Coruzzi, M. Adami, C. Pozzoli, E. Poli, G. Bertaccini (Pharmacology 1994;48: pages 69-76) and M. Leitold, W. Fleissig and A. Merk (Arzneim-Forsch/Drug Res. 34(I), Nr. 4, 1984).

The animals were treated in oral administration with amtolmetin guacyl 50 or 100 mg/kg, 1 h before the beginning of the perfusion with histamine. The controls received only the vehicle (CMC 1%).

After anaesthesia with urethan (1.25 g/kg i.p.), the oesophagus was ligated close to the stomach. Two cannulas of polyethylene are then inserted: one was inserted in the forestomach, the second one was inserted directly into the pyloric sphincter. The stomach was flushed with saline at 37° C. (1 ml/min) and the flushed liquid, collected every 15 minutes, titred at ph 7 with NaOH 10⁻² M. The acid secretion was induced by an intravenous infusion (0.1 ml/min) of histamine (30 μmol/kg/h).

The acidity is expressed as μEqH⁺ /15 min.

The results are listed in the following table 6.

                  TABLE 6     ______________________________________     Antisecretory activity of amtolmetin guacyl in rat           amtolmetin        amtolmetin           guacyl            guacyl     Time  50 mg/kg  P       100 mg/kg                                      P     Controls     (min) μEqH.sup.+ /15'                     ≦                             μEqH.sup.+ /15'                                      ≦                                            μEqH.sup.+ /15'     ______________________________________      0    4         --       8       --     9     15    4         n.s.     7       n.s.  12     30    5         0.05     9       0.05  22     45    11        0.05    11       0.05  36     60    15        0.05    12       0.05  46     75    17        0.05    13       0.01  50     90    19        0.05    14       0.01  60     105   18.5      0.01    15       0.01  63     120   22        0.01    13       0.01  68     135   20        0.01    14       0.01  69     ______________________________________

In all other experiments gastric acid secretion was stimulated with carbachol, gastrin and peptone and the results were perfectly coherent.

All of our results, both with the isolated stomach and with the stomach in situ, were duplicated and confirmed by the Huntingdon laboratories in the U.K. (b.r. No. 24, 25). Although these works are not available to the public at the filing date of the present application, they confirm the findings of the Applicant's tests and may be inspected with consent of Applicant.

2) Pharmaco-toxicological profile

Anti-inflammatory activity

Amtolmetin guacyl as an anti-inflammatory agent as confirmed by the pharmacological studies

Moreover, as with all the NSAIDs currently available, it inhibits gastric PGE₂ in the rat, albeit to a lesser degree than ASA (Table 7).

                  TABLE 7     ______________________________________     Effect of MED15 and of ASA* on gastric PGE.sub.2     in the rat              PGE.sub.2     Groups   (ngtg.sup.Δ  tissue) ± S.E.                              % inhibition                                        P     ______________________________________     Controls 108.7 ± 23.9     MED15    32.7 ± 8.5   69.9      0.022     ASA      14.4 ± 4.5   86.7      0.003     ______________________________________      *= acetyl salicylic acid      .sup.Δ = nanograms for gram of tissue

In order to have a full evaluation of the anti-inflammatory activity of the amtolmetin guacyl, a number of experimental tests have been carried out to duplicate the results already available to the Applicant. The tests have been carried out by the William Harvey Institute as follows.

Carrageenan Pleurisy

METHODS

Dosing

Compounds were administered orally 1 hour prior to and 1 hour post pleurisy induction in a volume of 0.5 ml 1% gum tragacanth. Indomethacin was used at 3 mg/kg. MED 15 was used at 25, 50 and 100 mg/kg.

Preparation of carrageenan

A 1% solution of carrageenan in sterile saline was prepared. The solution was placed in an incubator at 37° C. for half an hour to allow complete hydration of the carrageenan. The solution was then mixed to homogeneity.

Induction

A 21G×40 mm syringe needle was reduced in length to 5 mm and fitted to a 1 ml syringe containing the irritant. Rats were lightly anaesthetised with halothane. Each animal was placed on its left side. The skin over the thorax was lifted with and a 1 cm incision made through the skin with a pair of scissors. The wound was opened to expose the underlying muscle. Using a scalpel, a 2-3 mm incision was made into the muscle of the 5th-6th intercostal space. A volume of 0.15 ml of carrageenan solution was then injected into the pleural cavity. The wound was closed with a 11 mm Michel clip and the animal allowed to recover from the anaesthetic. Groups of animals were killed 4 hours after pleurisy induction.

Collection of pleural exudate

Lavage solution: One part of 3.15% trisodium citrate solution, mixed with nine parts of Hank's balanced salt solution.

Rats were killed by over exposure to carbon dioxide. For each rat the skin over the thorax was moistened with IMS alcohol. The skin over the sternum was then lifted and a 5 cm cut made, to expose the musculature of the upper abdomen and thoracic cavity. The muscle overlying the xiphisternum was lifted with tissue forceps and a 1 cm cut made through the muscle to reveal the cartilage. This was then lifted and the diaphragm perforated just beneath the cartilage. Two cuts were then made through the rib cage either side of the cartilage to form a flap which could be folded back to expose the thoracic cavity.

Using a syringe, 1 ml of lavage fluid was introduced into the thoracic cavity. The fluid was aspirated 2-3 times with a 3 ml pastette to wash the cavity, before being collected into separate 10 ml conical-based plastic test-tubes. Any blood contaminated fluids were rejected.

Quantification of exudates

The mass of each tube with fluid was determined. By subtracting the mass of an empty tube from these values, and assuming a density for the fluid of 1 g/cm³, the fluid volume was quantified.

Statistical analysis

Results were analysed by ANOVA followed by Bonferroni T-test. Values of p<0.05 were considered significant.

RESULTS

Results for exudated volume are shown in Table 8. Dosing was one hour prior to and one hour post pleurisy induction and inflammation was assessed at 4 hours.

Exudate volume

Exudate volume for gum tragacanth control was 0.94±0.04 ml. Indomethacin at 3 mg/kg caused a 50% reduction in exudate volume (p<0.01) compared to gum tragacanth control. MED 15 at all concentrations tended to decrease exudate volume by 11%, 21% and 44% at 25, 50 and 100 mg/kg respectively; with the highest dose giving a statistically significant reduction (p<0.05) compared to gum tragacanth control.

                  TABLE 8     ______________________________________     Carrageenan pleurisy (4 hour)     Control     Indo-     (gum        methacin MED15     MED15  MED15     tragacanth) 3 mg/kg  25 mg/kg  50 mg/kg                                           100 mg/kg     (n = 10)    (n = 11) (n = 9)   (n = 10)                                           (n = 9)     ______________________________________     Exudate           0.94 ± 0.47 ±                              0.84 +  0.74 ±                                             0.53 ±     volume           0.04      0.11     0.09    0.06   0.05     (ml)            P < 0.01 p = NS  p = NS P < 0.05     ______________________________________

Adjuvant arthritis

METHODS

Dosing

The drugs were administered daily by oral gavage for 4 days (day 0-3); piroxicam and MED 15 were dissolved in 5% Gum arabic+0.01% Tween 80, and administered in a volume of 0.5 ml. Piroxicam was administered as 3 mg/kg and MED 15 was administered as 25, 50 and 100 mg/kg doses. Table 8 bis illustrating dosage regimes.

    ______________________________________                  Arthritis induction                              Daily                  25 μl    200 μg                                      0.5 ml     Treatment    Saline      M. tb.  Drugs     ______________________________________     Non-arthritic                  L & R       --      Orally     saline + vehicle     Arthritis + vehicle                  R           L       Orally     Piroxicam 3 mg/kg                  R           L       Orally     MED15 25 mg/kg                  R           L       Orally     MED15 50 mg/kg                  R           L       Orally     MED15 100 mg/kg                  R           L       Orally     ______________________________________

Induction of arthritis

Under halothane anaesthesia, rats received 200 μg of heat-killed finely ground Mycobactyerium tubercolosis in 25 μl (80 mg/10 ml sterile saline) injected intra-articulary into the left stifle joint. The contralateral joint received 25 μl of 0.9% sterile saline. Control animals received 25 μl of 0.9% sterile saline in both knees. SGE 50 μl microsyringes with a volume lock calibrated at 25 μl were used with 30 G stainless steel needles. Solutions were prepared sterile, and aseptic technique was used throughout, with sterilisation of syringes between groups.

Joint inflammation

The rats were killed by carbon dioxide suffocation. The body weight was noted and the skin overlying the stifle joints was divided and the joint diameters assessed in mm using Mitutoyo vernier callipers (530-312, 0.02 mm).

Patellar bone erosion

The patellae were dissected, weighed (Sartorius, 0.01 mg) and then immersed in 1 ml digestion buffer (see below) to remove soft tissue.

Digestive buffer was prepared fresh to the following formula; disodium hydrogen orthophosphate 20 mM, EDTA 1 mM and diothiothreitol at 2 mM. Papain (EC 3.4.22.2) was added at a concentration of 6 U/ml. Each patella was digested in 1 ml of digestive buffer at 56° C. for 4 hours. The residual paterllar bones were dried (100° C. 24 hours) and weighed (Sartorius 0.01 mg).

Calculations and statistical analysis

Results are presented as follows: left and right parameter alone, the difference between arthritic and contralateral control joint (left-right); and % difference between arthritic and control joints ( left-right!/right!X100).

Units

Joint diameter mm

Patellar bone mass mg

Calculations were carried out using the spreadsheet program Lotus 123. Statistical comparisons were made between the absolute differences using INSTAT Mann Whitney unpaired two-tailed statistical test.

                  TABLE 9     ______________________________________     The effects of daily oral dosing of piroxicam or MED15     in rat knee joint diameters.                            Swelling                 Joint diameter                            Diameter                 (mm)       difference                                     %     Treatment  n      Left    Right  (L - R)                                             Change     ______________________________________     Non-arthritic vehicle                10     8.53 ±                               8.63 ±                                      -0.10 ±                                             -1.17 ±     controls          0.08    0.08   0.04   0.51     Arthritic vehicle                10     12.22 ±                               8.69 ±                                      3.53 ±                                             40.66 ±     controls          0.18    0.11   0.15   1.78     Piroxicam 3 mg/kg                10     10.41 ±                               8.74 ±                                      1.67 ±                                             19.15 ±                       0.09    0.05   0.10   1.17     MED15 25 mg/kg                10     11.57 ±                               9.35 ±                                      2.22 ±                                             24.04 ±                       0.20    0.21   0.14   1.78     MED15 50 mg/kg                10     10.95 ±                               8.88 ±                                      2.06 ±                                             23.36 ±                       0.14    0.15   0.16   1.98     MED15 100 mg/kg                 9     10.26 ±                               8.88 ±                                      1.38 ±                                             15.71 ±                       0.10    0.15   0.14   1.73     ______________________________________

Patellar bone mass

Table 10 shows the effects of drug treatments on patellar bone mass. There was a large reduction in bone mass in the arthritic (p<0.0001) groups compared to the non-arthritic group reflecting erosion. Although there was no statistically significant difference in the loss of bone mass of the arthritic groups the piroxicam treated group showed the greatest protection against bone loss. MED 15 displayed a dose dependent protective effect which was not significantly different to piroxicam at a dose of 100 mg/kg.

                  TABLE 10     ______________________________________     The effects of daily oral dosing of piroxicam or MED15     on rat patellar bone mass.                           Bone loss                 Bone mass (mg)                           Left - Right                                     %     Treatment  n      Left    Right (mg)    Change     ______________________________________     Non-arthritic vehicle                10     3.59 ±                               3.73 ±                                     -0.09 ± 0.13                                             -3.39 ±     controls          0.16    0.11          2.90     Arthritic vehicle                10     2.03 ±                               3.96 ±                                     -1.93 ± 0.34                                             -48.06 ±     controls          0.31    0.15          7.97     Piroxicam 3 mg/kg                10     3.07 ±                               4.21 ±                                     -1.31 ± 0.11                                             -27.74 ±                       0.13    0.09          2.26     MED15 25 mg/kg                10     2.33 ±                               4.27 ±                                     -1.94 ± 0.18                                             45.45 ±                       0.18    0.08          4.13     MED15 50 mg/kg                10     2.49 ±                               4.18 ±                                     -1.69 ± 0.12                                             40.55                       0.14    0.10          2.82     MED15 100 mg/kg                 9     2.97 ±                               4.34 ±                                     -1.38 ± 0.08                                             31.85 ±                       0.12    0.08          1.93     ______________________________________

Toxicological profile

From a toxicological viewpoint the drug offers an excellent torability profile. In fact, the drug safety trials demonstrated absence of effects on blood pressure and on the cardiovascular system (b.r. No. 4).

Acute toxicity studies (b.r. No. 5), indicated excellent drug tolerability. Studies carried out by the Hazleton laboratories (b.r. No. 6 and 7) in particular, demonstrated absence of gastric damage following chronic oral administration for 52 weeks in the rat and in the Cynomolgous monkey.

The fertility, embriotoxicity and teratogenicity studies in the rat and in the rabbit (b.r. No. 8, 9 and 10) demonstrated the safety product.

In the same way the Ames test (b.r. No. 11), forward mutation in Saccharomycetes pombe Pl (b.r. No. 12), mitotic conversion in Saccharomycetes D4 (b.r. No. 13), chromosomic aberrations in human lymphocites cultivated in vitro (b.r. No. 14), micronucleus test in rat bone marrow (b.r. No. 15) all demonstrated absence of amtolmetin guacyl-related damage.

Carcinogenesis studies in the rat administered by gavage with amtolmetin guacyl for a period covering the animal's life-span (b.r. No. 16) demonstrated the innocuity of the product.

3) Mechanism of action

Interest in the amtolmetin guacyl molecule arose following a thorough analysis of the results of 31 comparative and 6 non-comparative clinical trials involving 1596 patients. All of the studies revealed an extremely low incidence of adverse events involving the stomach (5% circa) which compared the product very favourably with the other NSAIDs, in which the incidence was in the region of 30% or more (as in the case of indomethacin) with frequent interruptions of treatment. This 5% was considered by us to be practically null in consideration of the fact that all of the patients reporting side effects frequently had a past history of concomitant disease and previous medical treatment; also, it cannot be excluded that antihistamine drugs were taken during the course of the experimentation which are known to interfere with the mechanisms of gastric protection of amtolmetin guacyl. Furthermore the physician, being aware of administering an NSAID, was expecting adverse events and could not be expected to be an impartial observer. The few cases of gastrointestinal phenomena reported with amtolmetin guacyl were transitory and in no event accompanied by the presence of occult blood in the stools. Moreover, even in the presence of a reported side-effect it was almost never necessary to suspend treatment (0.4% of suspensions).

On the basis of the above series of observations, we decided to study the pharmacological behaviour of a number of widely used NSAIDs (including amtolmetin guacyl) towards the gastric mucosa in the rat, as previously described. Having univocally established the effect of amtolmetin guacyl on the reduction of gastric acid, the question of the mechanism of action of this effect arose. The first hypothesis was that we were deling with an anti-H₂ drug, given the fact that its potency could be compared with that of cimetidine. However, when using an organ in which only H₂ receptors were present (guinea-pig atrium) the drug did not interfere with the H₂ receptors (FIG. 5).

On the other hand, we had previously noted differences between potentiometric determination of H+ and NaOH titration of the gastric effluate, in agreement with the substantial literature available on the subject, This fact was clearly in favour of a strong presence of bicarbonates (b.r. No. 27, 28).

Experiments on bicarbonate secretion (under the same conditions as these of the acid secretion studies) following stimulation with histamine and treatment with amtolmeting guacyl, demonstrated an increase in bicarbonate production of 67% (FIG. 6).

In parallel we also studied the possible effect on intestinal motility in the guinea-pig isolated ileum (b.r. No. 29) using various agonists (FIG. 7, 8 and 9).

Having established the amtolmeting guacyl-related decrease in motility using all of the traditional agonists, we proceeded to verify whether this same effect was present at gastric level. Using acetilcholine and serotonin as agonists in the rat isolated stomach strips model (b.r. No. 30), we obtained clear evidence of down-regulation of motility also in this organ (FIG. 10, 11 and 12).

In the course of various studies conducted on animals to show the lack of renal impairment, a test was carried out to compare the diuresis in normally hydrated rats treated orally for 8 consecutive days with amtolmeting guacyl and diclofenac, which is also a NSAID. From the results, which are shown in FIG. 13, it is possible to observe a definite increase in diuresis in the animals which were treated with amtolmeting guacyl and a likewise clear decrease in the animals treated with diclofenac. It is to be stressed that the behaviour of diclofenac is completely in line with the behaviour of a NSAID as known in the art, that is to say to markedly reduce the diuresis, while that of amtolmeting guacyl is completely unforeseeable.

The results obtained led to the identification of a mechanism of action which would simultaneously account for:

1)--decrease of acidity

2)--increase of bicarbonates

3)--increase of gastric blood flow

4)--increase of diuresis

5)--decrease of motility.

At this stage CGRP (calcitonin gene related peptide) was considered a good candidate to match with all of the parameters to be considered. CGRP is a 37 aminoacid polipeptide which depresses gastric acidity (b.r. No. 31, 32).

Experiments carried out using a specific antagonist of CGRP (CGRP₈ -₃₇) demonstrated that inhibition of this polipeptide leads to blockage of the amtolmetin guacyl--related activity on gastric secretion. This demonstrates thet CGRP actually is implicated in the mechanism of action of amtolmetin guacyl (FIG. 14).

These results were confirmed by Huntingdon Life Sciences U.K.

CGRP production itself is known to be stimulated by the vanilloid (or capsaicin) sensitive receptors which simultaneously produce an increase in bicarbonate production (b.r. No. 33). A comparison between the capsaicin structures and amtolmetin guacyl shoos that all of these structures contain a vanilloid radical in their molecules (FIG. 15).

The hypothesis of the impact of amtolmetin guacyl on the vanilloid receptors was therefore strengthened and the experimental demonstration was obtained using capsazepine, a specific receptor antagonist of capsaicin (FIG. 16). The introduction of a guaiacol moiety into the amtolmetin guacyl molecule led to the insertion of a vanilloid radical which confers gastroprotective properties to the molecule. Moreover, although capsaicin possesses revulsive and inhibitory properties, both nonivamide and amtolmetin guacyl are inhibited by the capsazepine antagonist, and do not determine any irritative phenomena (b.r. No. 34, 35, 36).

In the in vivo experimentation, evaluated as effect of the product both on gastric mucosal secretion and on the healthy condition of the mucosa itself, it wanted that in the presence of an inhibitor of H₁ receptors (therefore a typical antihistamine agent), the gastroprotective effect of amtolmetin guacyl drops out. This is a further demonstration of the impact of amtolmetin guacyl on the vanilloid receptors, due to the well known interference existing between these receptors and drugs such as diphenidramine (b.r. No. 37) and pyrilamine (b.r. No.38). All of this constitutes a precise forewarning of the association of amtolmetin guacyl with H₁ receptor inhibiting substances on pain of loss of the gastroprotective properties of the former (FIG. 17 and 18).

The presence of the vanilloid radical, essential to the expression of the gastroprotective mechanism, is guaranteed by the prolonged persistence of high amounts of intact amtolmetin guacyl molecule in the gastric and intestinal walls (at least 2 hours after oral administration in the rat).

CGRP down-regulates acid secretion and also produces intense vasodilation of gastric mucosa and of the kidney, where it produces an increase in glomerular infiltration rate (which justifies the diuretic effect of amtolmetin guacyl) (b.r. No. 39). Also, the decrease in amtolmetin guacyl-determined motility which we observed may be attributed to increased CGRP, a notorious inhibitor of gastrointestinal motility (b.r. No. 40).

Recent studies indicate that the vasodilatatory and cytoprotective effects of CGRP at the gastric level implicate, at least in part, NO-dependent mechanisms (b.r. No. 41). Implication of nitric oxide in the smooth muscle relaxation exercised by CGRP has also been demonstrated (b.r. No. 42).

Glycine is released during the metabolic processes of amtolmetin guacyl. Since glycine determines an increase in glomerular filtrate and this effect is inhibited by an antagonist of NO synthesis, it is legitimate to consider NO as the mediator of the action exercised on this mechanism by glycine. Hence, since NO is implicated in the mechanism of action of CGRP and of glycine, and the latter aminoacid is one of the amtolmetin guacyl metabolites, we may deduce that glycine also contributes to the positive renal effects exercised by the product.

From the results summarized above amtolmetin guacyl emerges as an NSAID with a completely new profile necessitating specific indications in use: in particular, being an anti-secretory drug and inhibitor of gastric motility, it has to be administered on an empty stomach so as not to interfere with normal digestive processes. It has to be stressed that this is the first case in which a NSAID is administered on empty stomach, while all other NSAIDs administered invariably after meals. Moreover, for what explained above, amtolmetin guacyl in order to have its gastro- and renal-protective effect has to be administered without concomitant assumption of H₁ -receptor inhibiting drugs.

In conclusion, the data presented indicate that amtolmetin guacyl is an anti-inflammatory drug with outstanding characteristics, which make its use possible in patients in whom the administration of NSAIDs is usually contraindicated.

4) Clinics

Once the mechanism of action of MED 15 was found and its pharmacology defined we proceeded to establish the efficacy and tolerability in man.

The pharmacodynamic profile of amtolmetin guacyl must necessarily depart from its antiphlogistic and antalgic properties, the two aspects of most interest to both the patient and the physician.

To do this we must analyze the different efficacy of amtolmetin guacyl compared with some of the most widely used NSAIDs in the treatment of the four following conditions:

1)--rheumatoid arthritis

2)--osteoarthritis

3)--extra-articular rheumatism

4)--post-operatory pain.

Following are summarized the results obtained on a total of 1596 patients in 37 clinical trials.

Rheumatoid arthritis

Amtolmetin guacyl was compared with ibuprofen, indomethacin, piroxicam and tolmetin.

As reported in Table 11, when administered to 150 patients with rheumatoid arthritis in the active phase Amtolmetin guacyl demonstrated significantly more rapid and marked anti-inflammatory activity compared to the reference NSAIDs.

The anti-inflammatory activity of Amtolmetin guacyl in rheumatoid arthritis would make it the product of choice in the treatment of this disease.

                  TABLE 11     ______________________________________     Indication: rheumatoid arthritis     ______________________________________     Patients:            150     Days of treatment:    30     Reference NSAIDs:    Ibuprofen                          Indomethacin                          Piroxicam                          Tolmetin     Evaluation of antiphlogistic activity:     Amtolmetin guacyl demonstrated statistical     significant activity more rapid and more marked     when compared to the reference NSAIDs in     rheumatoid arthritis.     ______________________________________

Osteoarthritis

In this degenerative disease amtolmetin guacyl was compared with diclofenac, diflunisal, flurbiprofen, ibuprofen, ketoprofen, naproxen and tolmetin. Amtolmetin guacyl demonstrated statistically significant more rapid and more marked activity, as reported in Table 12.

                  TABLE 12     ______________________________________     Indication: osteoarthritis     ______________________________________     Patients:             550     Days of treatment:    mean 80     Reference NSAIDs:     Diclofenac                           Diflunisal                           Flurbiprofen                           Ibuprofen                           Ketoprofen                           Naproxen                           Tolmetin     Evaluation of antiphlogistic activity:     Amtolmetin guacyl was more rapid and more active     in a statistically significant manner in osteoarthritis     compared to the reference NSAIDs.     ______________________________________

The anti-inflammatory activity of amtolmetin guacyl in osteoarthritis would make it the product of choice in the treatment of this disease.

Extra-articular rheumatism

In extra-articular rheumatism amtolmetin guacyl was compared with diclofenac, naproxen and piperazine propionate. The results are shown in Table 13.

                  TABLE 13     ______________________________________     Indication: extra-articular rheumatism     ______________________________________     Patients:          90     Days of treatment: 14     Reference NSAIDS:  Diclofenac                        Naproxen                        Piperazine propionate     Evaluation of antiphlogistic activity:     In this indication no significant differences were     noted between amtolmetin guacyl and the reference     compounds.     ______________________________________

Post-operative pain

As reported in Table 14, the analgesic properties of amtolmetin guacyl were tested in postoperative pain with good results.

The same can be said in the treatment of post-traumatic arthralgia.

                  TABLE 14     ______________________________________     Indication:     a) post-operative pain     b) post-traumatic arthralgia,                Latency    Max. effect Duration     N. patients               Dose   (mins.)      time (mins.)                                              (mins.)     ______________________________________     a)  Amtolmetin                   100    1200 mg    30   180   360         guacyl     b)  Amtolmetin                   15     600 mg × 2-daily*                                     20   60    360         guacyl     c)  Diclofenac                   15      50 mg × 2-daily*                                     20   60    180     ______________________________________      *at 12hour intervals

The data obtained indicate that the antalgic effect is statistically significant in post-operative pain and this effect is already evaluable at 30' following administration. The peak effect is obtained only after 2 hours, and it is maintained for 6 hours.

When compared with diclofenac in post-traumatic arthralgia Amtolmetin guacyl showed the same latency time (20 minutes), the same time to reach peak effect (1 hour), but a longer duration of effect (6 hours as opposed to 3 hours).

Conclusions

Clinical studies demonstrate that amtolmetin guacyl has very marked anti-inflammatory activity, primarily in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis and post-operative pain. There were no differences compared to the other NSAIDs in the treatment of extra-articular rheumatism. The results are summarised in Table 15.

The singularity of the compound lies in the long duration of the peak effect (6 hours), unlike all of the other NSAIDs.

                  TABLE 15     ______________________________________     Antiphlogistic activity     ______________________________________     Antiphlogistic activity evaluation:     excellent.sup.++++  good.sup.+++, poor.sup.++     Rheumatoid arthritis                        .sup.++++     Osteoarthritis     .sup.++++     Post-operative pain                        .sup.++++     Extra-articular rheumatism                        .sup.+++     ______________________________________

II Parameter: tolerability

Drug tolerability is important for the correct calculation of the risk/benefit ratio. of relevance for NSAIDs is the recognition of gastric (A) and renal (B) side-effects.

A) NSAIDs and gastric damage

The incidence of the undesirable side effects of NSAIDs on the gastric mucosa varies depending on the drug structure and its pharmaceutical form. The buffered effervescent formulations, for example, avoid the gastric mucosa/compound primary damage but not damage the mucosa after re-cycling.

With the NSAIDs known to date the incidence of side effects involving the gastric mucosa is about 20-30% the elderly, in whom the adaptive processes are often slowed down or compromised, being the most affected.

NSAID-related gastric damage is due to the inhibition of gastric prostaglandins which results in a NSAID-related hydrochloric acid hypersecretion; in fact NSAIDs by inhibiting all prostaglandin synthesis (and this is inherent to their anti-inflammatory activity), also protective prostaglandins of the gastric mucosa.

Amtolmetin guacyl and gastric protection

Amtolmetin guacyl shows good anti-inflammatory activity in man and the pharmacological studies conducted in rats showed that this effect is due to inhibition of both COX1 (cyclooxygenase 1) and COX2 (cyclooxygenase 2).

Amtolmetin guacyl therefore also inhibits the COX1 known to induce the synthesis of those prostaglandins which protect the gastric mucosa and the renal flow as well as the synthesis of TXA₂ (thromboxane A₂), a potent platelet aggregating agent. For all of these reasons the drug was expected to induce gastric damage and inhibit platelet aggregation.

Amtolmetin guacyl does indeed demonstrate significant platelet antiaggregating properties, but it has also demonstrated in clinics (with before/after endoscopies) not to induce gastric lesions, especially when administered on an empty stomach.

The mechanism of action of amtolmetin guacyl is linked to stimulation of both vanilloid receptors and CGRP (calcitonin gene-related peptide) receptors, as demonstrated using specific inhibitors. Moreover, the structure of MED 15 contains a vanilloid moiety; this appears to be the reason for its specific stimulating effect. The various chemical structures are reported in FIG. 15 for comparison.

Amtolmetin guacyl per se fails to modify basal acid secretion; its gastroprotective effect arises only when H+ production exceeds a certain limit.

B) Renal tolerability.

Inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis is known to reflect negatively on renal function since prostaglandins are delegated to the modulation of renal blood flow and they are physiologically released to counteract the renovasoconstriction produced by angiotensin II.

CGRP overflow from the stomach into the bloodstream produces visible effects in patients (red flushed appearance) and effects on the kidney (increase in diuresis), counteracting the effects of prostaglandin inhibition.

To shed some light on the possible exploitation of this unexpected effect on the kidney we listed the classes of patients which show the highest risk of developing renal failures when treated with NSAIDs.

                  TABLE 16     ______________________________________     Patient groups at highest risk of developing NSAID-     induced renal failure     ______________________________________     Certain:   congestive heart failure                hepatic insufficiencies with ascites                nephrosis                disorders involving decrease of blood volume                (ex. dehydration)                chronic glomerulonephritis                chronic renal failure                systemic lupos erythematosus                multiple myeloma     Possible:  the elderly (especially diabetics                and hypertensives)                atherosclerotic-related cardiovascular                disease                gouty arthritis (precipitated by diuretics                in the elderly)                patients submitted to general anaesthesia                patients with sepsis, endotoxemia and serious                infections                concomitant diuretic treatment                patients on low-salt diets                chronic pyelonephritis     ______________________________________

Amtolmetin guacyl and renal function

Despite the fact that amtolmetin guacyl is a NSAID, it has been surprisingly found that it antagonizes the renal vasoconstriction provoked by the inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis.

As proof of the above, studies carried out in rats demonstrated that a single dose of Amtolmetin guacyl increased diuresis in these animals by an average of 10%, whilst diclofenac decreased it by an average of 10%.

Repeated doses (one per day) for 8 days increased diuresis in the treated rats by 35% (see FIG. 13).

Tolerability: conclusions

The tolerability of amtolmetin guacyl is very good and no significant variations of the routine biological parameters were observed during or after treatment.

The organs most open to damage by the NSAIDs, the gastrointestinal system and the kidneys, benefit from the protective activity of Amtolmetin guacyl, without detriment to the therapeutic activity of the drug.

At present in clinics NSAID-related side-effects are minimized by the simultaneous delivery of H₂ -receptor antagonists or protonic pump inhibitors or gastroprotective prostaglandins. All these treatments have their own side-effects. In our case this protective effect is obtained with a single drug, improving therapy acceptability on the part of the patient, especially in the long-term treatments.

Confirmation of the above described advantages is the very low incidence of treatment suspension for adverse events found in clinics (Table 17), which is not the case for most of NSAIDs known in the art (Table 18).

Table 17 reports the results of amtolmetin guacyl in a cohort of 949 patients.

                  TABLE 17     ______________________________________     Suspensions of treatment for adverse events with     amtolmetin guacyl     Days of treatment                 N. patients                            Treatment suspended                                          %     ______________________________________     10          190        3             1, 6     21           70        0     30          140        1             0, 7     60          225        0     90          225        0     120          25        0     150          49        0     180          25        0     Total       949        4             0, 4     ______________________________________

                  TABLE 18     ______________________________________     Incidence of treatment suspension for adverse events:     meloxicam and diclofenac                   Meloxicam                           Diclofenac 100 mg     ______________________________________     Days of treatment                     180       180     N. patients     336       336     Suspensions of treatment                      42        63     % of totale     12, 4     18, 7     ______________________________________

As can be seen from this table, the differences of tolerability between Amtolmetin guacyl, meloxicam and diclofenac appear wide; it must be taken into consideration that the 6-month (a total of 60.480 days) duration of the meloxicam and diclofenac studies well compares with the duration of the Amtolmetin guacyl studies (a total of 56.170 days)

In any case all reports of gastric discomfort (4%) were of a minor nature resolved spontaneously during the course of the treatment. These minor events may be explained by the possibility that the drug was taken after meals or in concomitance with antihistamine (anti-H₁) agents, which inhibit the gastroprotective effect of amtolmetin guacyl whilst maintaining its antiinflammatory effect. Consequently amtolmetin guacyl, to show its activity, has to be administered on empty stomach and without a concomitant administration of H₁ -receptor inhibiting drug.

In summary, due to its antiinflammatory properties and protective effect on the stomach and kidney, the following patient categories are specifically good responders to MED 15 treatment:

subjects with a need for a long term treatment with a NSAID, subjects with specific gastric and/or renal intolerance to NSAID's, subjects with preexisting gastritis and/or gastric and/or gastroduodenal lesions, subjects with NSAID-related renal impairment due to vasoconstriction, subjects with reduced renal function or in damage thereof.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

1) Matera Prof. M., Ist. di Farmacologia, Cattedra di Chemioterapia, Facolta di Medicina e Chirurgia, Universita di Catania, 1986, "Evaluation of the pilarmacodynamic activity of MED15--antinflammatory, analgesic and antipyretic activity".

2) Seed M. P., Greenslade K. J., Willoughby D. A., William Harvey Research Inst., London, 1996, "Study into the Effects of MED15 on Monoarticular Arthritis in the Rat".

3) Greenslade K. J., Moore A. R., Willoughby D. A., William Harvey Research Inst., London, 1996, "Study into the Effects of MED15 on Carrageenan Pleurisy in the Rat".

4) Matera Prof. M., Ist. di Farmacologia, Cattedra di Chemioterapia, Facolta di Medicina e Chirurgia, Universita di Catania, 1989, "Effects of MED15 on Blood Pressure, ECG and Heartbeat Frequency in the Anaesthetized Rat".

5) Matera Prof. M., Ist. di Farmacologia, Cattedra di Chemioterapia, Facolta di Medicina e Chirurgia, Universita di Catania, 1989, "Study of the Acute Toxicity of MED15".

6) Zuhlke U., Hazleton Research Labs., 1992, Project 419-500, "Medosan15--52-week oral (gavage) chronic toxicity study in the rat with an eight-week treatment-free period".

7) ZuhIke U., Hazleton Research Labs, Project 419-501, 1992, "Medosan15--52-week oral (gavage) chronic toxicity study in the cynomolgous monkey with an eight-week treatment-free period".

8) Allen P. A., Mladenovic P., Terrier Ch., RCC Research % Consulting Company, 1989, "Embryotoxicity Study (Including Teratogenicity) with MED15 in the Rat and in the Rat".

9) Allen P. A., Mladenovic P., Terrier Ch., RCC Research % Consulting Company, 1989, "Embryotoxicity Study (Including Teratogenicity) with MED15 in the Rat and in the Rabbit".

10) Allen P. A., Mladenovic P., RCC Research & Consulting Company, 1989, "Fertility and General Reproduction Study with MED15 in the Rat".

11) Forster R., Monaco M., Nunziata A., LSR-RTC, 1983, "Reverse Mutation in Salmonella Typhimurium. Test substance: Medosan15 (Ames Test)".

12) Forster R., Monaco M., Nunziata A., LSR-RTC, 1983, "Forward Mutation in Schizosaccharomyces Pombe 1. Test substance: Medosan15".

13) Forster R., Monaco M., Nunziata A., LSR-RTC, 1983, "Mitotic Gene Conversion in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae D4. Test substance: Medosan15".

14) Conz A., Fumero S., RBM Antione Marxer, 1989, "Chromosome Aberrations in Human Lymphocytes Cultured in vitro. Test substance: MED15".

15) Conz A., Fumero S., RBM Antione Marxer, 1989, "Micronucleus Test in Rat Bone Marrow. Test substance: MED15".

16) Germano O., Maraschin R., RBM Antione Marxer, 1995, "Evaluation of the carcinogenicity of the test article ST679/MED15 administered by oral route to the rat for a period covering most of its lifespan".

17) Tubaro E., Belogi L., Mezzadri C. M., Ruco L., Stoppacciaro A. "Studies on the gastric tolerability of the new non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug amtolmetin guacyl". Arzneim Forsch Drug Res 1995;45:1298-1302.

18) Bunce K. T., Parsons M. E. "A quantitative study of metiamide, a histamine H₂ -antagonist, on the isolated whole rat stomach" J Physiol 1976;258:453-465."

19) Boughton-Smith N. K., Whittle B. J. R. "The gastric antisecretory actions of prostaglandin E₂ and stable prostacyclin analogues against different secretagogues in perfused whole stomachs of rat of mouse in vitro" Br J Pharmacol 1981;72:291-298.

20) Wan B. Y. C. "Metiamide and stimulated acid secretion from the isolated non-distended and distended mouse stomach" J Physiol 1977;266:327-346.

21) Suzuki A., Kamejama J., Tsukamoto M., Suzuki Y. "Bicarbonate secretion in isolated guinea-pig antrum" J Clin Gastroenterol, 1990;12(Suppl):14-18.

22) Kameyama J., Suzuki A., Tsukamoto M., Suzuki Y., Kaneko K. "Effects of bile acids and bilirubin on bicarbonate secretion of isolated guinea-pig antrum" J Clin Gastroenterol, 1992;14(Suppl):102-106.

23) Leithold M., Fleissig W., Merk A. "Anti-ulcer and secretion-inhibitory properties of the tricyclic derivative Doxepin in rats and dogs". Arzneim Forsch Drug Res 1984;34:468-473.

24) Munt P. I. , Williams C. Huntingdon Life Sciences U.K., 1996 "MED15 (amtolmetine guacyl)--Effect on gastric acid secretion in the anaesthetized rat".

25) Munt P. I. , Williams C. Huntingdon Life Sciences U.K., 1996 "MED15 (amtolmetine guacyl)--Effect on gastric acid secretion in vitro".

26) Bertaccini G., Coruzzi G., Scarpignato C. "Effects of alkyl analogues of histamine and metiamide on the isolated guinea pig heart". Pharmacology 1981;22:101-107.

27) Odes H. S., Hogan D. L., Steinbach H. H., Ballesteros M. A., Koss M. A., Isenberg J. I. "Measurement of gastric bicarbonate secretion in the human stomach: different methods produce discordant results". Scand J Gastroenterol 1992;27:829-836.

28) Segawa K., Arisawa T., Niwa Y, Kato T., Tsukamoto Y., Goto H., Hayakawa T., Nakazawa S. "The relationship between titrated acidity (mEq/l) and pH of human gastric juice: a study based on the data estimated by pHmeter". Nippon Shokakibyo Gakkai Zasshi 1994;91:849-853.

29) Barker L. A. "Histamine H1 and miuscarinic receptor antagonist activity of cimetidine and tiotidine in the guinea pig isolated ileum". Agents Actions 1981;11:699-705.

30) Vane J. "A sensitive method for the assay of 5H-hydroxytryptamine". Br J Pliariac 1957;12:344-349.

31) Manela F. D., Ren J., Gao J., McGuigan J. E., Harty R. F. "Calcitonin gene-related peptide modulates acid-mediated reguation of somatostatin and gastrin release from rat antrum" Gastroenterology 1995;109:701-706.

32) Ren J., Young R. L., Lassiter D. C., Harty R. F. "Calcitonin gene-related peptide mediates capsaicin-induced neuroendocrine responses in rat antrum". Gastroenterology 1993;104:485-491.

33) Takeuchi K., Ohuchi T., Matsumoto J., Okabe S. "Regulation of gastroduodenal bicarbonate secretion by capsaicin-sensitive sensory neurons in rats". J Clin Gastroenterology 1993;17(Suppl):533-539.

34) Yeh J. L., Lo Y. C., Wang Y., Chen I. J. "Cardiovascular interactions of nonivamide, glyceryl nonivamide, capsaicin analogues, and substance P antagonist in rats". Brain Res Bull 1993;30:641-648.

35) Wu P. C., Fang J. Y., Huanu Y. B., Tsai Y. H. "In vitro effect of penetration enhancers on sodium nonivamide acetate in rat skin". Biol Pharm Bull 1995;18:1790-1792.

36) WU J. R., Fann S. F., Yeli J. L., Lo Y. C., Huang T. Y., Chen I. J. "Multiple sensory and fiunctional effects ofnon-phenolic aminodimethylene nonivamide: an approach to capsaicin antagonist". Gen Pharmacol 1996;27:151-158.

37) Mathison R., Davison J. S. "Regulation of jejunal arterioles by capsaicin-sensitive nerves in Nippostrongylus brasiliensis-sensitized rats". J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1995;273:337-343.

38) Wallace J. L., McKnight G. W., Befus A. D. "Capsaicin-induced hyperemia in the stomach: possible contribution of mast cells". Am J Physiol 1992;263:G209-14.

39) Palla R., Parrini M., Panichi V., Andreini B., De Pietro S. "Acute effects of calcitonin gene related peptide on renal haemodynamics and renin and angiotensin II secretion in patients with renal disease". Int J Tissue React 1995;17:43-49.

40) Tache Y., Raybould Y., Wei J. Y. "Central and peripheral actions of calcitonin gene related peptide on gastric secretory and motor function"Adv Exp Med Biol 1991;298:183-198.

41) Lamrecht N., Burchert M., Respondek M., Muller K. M., Peskar B. M. "Role of CGRP and NO in the gastroprotective effect ofccapsaicin in the rat. Gastroenterology 1993;104:1371-1380.

42) Kline L. W., Pang P. K. T. "Nitric oxide modulates the CGRP-induced relaxation in guinea pig gallbladder strips in vitro". Rag Pept 1994;50:207-212.

43) Garcia G. E., Hammond T. C., Wead L. M., Mendonca M. M., Brown N. R., Gabbai F. B. "Effect of angiotensin II on the renal response to aminoacid in rats".Am J Kidney Dis 1996;1:115-23. 

I claim:
 1. A method for treating an inflammatory pathological condition with a NSAID with protection from NSAID-related hydrochloric acid hypersecretion and from NSAID-related renal vasoconstriction comprising the step ofadministering to a subject in need of said treatment an effective amount of 2-methoxyphenyl-1-methyl-5p-methylbenzoyl-pyrrol-2-acetamido acetate.
 2. The method according to claim 1, wherein said subject is selected from the group consisting of:subjects with a need for a long-term treatment with a NSAID, subjects with specific gastric and/or renal intolerance to NSAIDs, subjects with preexisting gastritis and/or gastric and/or gastroduodenal lesions, subjects with NSAID-related renal impairment due to vasoconstriction, and subjects with reduced renal function or in damage thereof.
 3. The method according to claim 2, wherein said effective amount of 2-methoxyphenyl-1-methyl-5p-methylbenzoyl-pyrrol-2-acetamido acetate is between 600 and 1200 mg/day.
 4. The method according to claim 3, wherein said effective amount of 2-methoxyphenyl-1-methyl-5p-methylbenzoyl-pyrrol-2-acetamido acetate is formulated together with a pharmaceutically acceptable vehicle.
 5. The method according to claim 4, wherein said subject has an empty stomach.
 6. The method according to claim 5, wherein said administering takes place without concomitant administration of H₁ -receptor inhibiting drugs.
 7. A method for anti-inflammatory treatment and for release of neuropeptides to provide a gastroprotective effect and a renal vasodilatative effect in a patient in need of said treatment, comprising the step ofadministering to said patient in need of said treatment an effective amount of 2-methoxyphenyl-1-methyl-5p-methylbenzoyl-pyrrol-2-acetamido acetate.
 8. A method for increasing gastric mucous, increasing gastric and duodenal bicarbonates, increasing mucosal bloodflow, decreasing acid secretion and decreasing gastric motility in a patient in need of at least one said treatment, comprising the step ofadministering to said patient in need of said treatment an effective amount of 2-methoxyphenyl-1-methyl-5p-methylbenzoyl-pyrrol-2-acetamido acetate, said effective amount being an amount sufficient to release an effective amount of a neuropeptide selected from the group consisting of CGRP, VIP, GIP, somatostatin and SP.
 9. The method according to claim 8 wherein said amount is sufficient to release an effective amount of said CGRP.
 10. The method according to claim 7, wherein said patient is selected from the group consisting of:subjects with a need for a long-term treatment with a NSAID, subjects with specific gastric and/or renal intolerance to NSAIDs, subjects with preexisting gastritis and/or gastric and/or gastroduodenal lesions, subjects with NSAID-related renal impairment due to vasoconstriction, and subjects with reduced renal function or in damage thereof.
 11. The method according to claim 10, wherein said effective amount of 2-methoxyphenyl-1-methyl-5p-methylbenzoyl-pyrrol-2-acetamido acetate is between 600 and 1200 mg/day.
 12. The method according to claim 11, wherein said effective amount of 2-methoxyphenyl-1-methyl-5p-methylbenzoyl-pyrrol-2-acetamido acetate is formulated together with a pharmaceutically acceptable vehicle.
 13. The method according to claim 12, wherein said patient has an empty stomach.
 14. The method according to claim 13, wherein said administering takes place without a concomitant administration of H₁ -receptor inhibiting drugs.
 15. A method for treating an inflammatory pathological condition in a patient in need thereof and suffering from reduced renal function or in danger thereof or with specific renal intolerance to NSAIDs or with NSAID-related renal impairment due to vasoconstriction, comprisingadministering to said subject an anti-inflammatory effective amount of 2-methoxyphenyl-1-methyl-5p-methylbenzoyl-pyrrol-2-acetamido acetate.
 16. The method according to claim 15, wherein said renal impairment comprises specific renal intolerance to NSAIDs and NSAID-related renal impairment due to vasoconstriction.
 17. The method according to claim 16, wherein said effective amount of 2-methoxyphenyl-1-methyl-5p-methylbenzoyl-pyrrol-2-acetamido acetate is between 600 and 1200 mg/day.
 18. The method according to claim 17, wherein said effective amount of 2-methoxyphenyl-1-methyl-5p-methylbenzoyl-pyrrol-2-acetamido acetate is formulated together with a pharmaceutically acceptable vehicle.
 19. The method according to claim 18, wherein said subject has an empty stomach.
 20. The method according to claim 19, wherein said administering takes place without a concomitant administration of H₁ -receptor inhibiting drugs.
 21. A method for the treatment of pain and inflammation in a patient requiring long term administration of an anti-inflammatory compound, comprising administering to said patient an amount of amtolmetin guacil effective to control pain and inflammation and simultaneously provide a gastroprotective effect not produced by Naproxen, Nimesulide, Piroxicam or Tolmetin, whereby said amtolmetin guacil may be administered safely over a term longer than the term allowed by said other drugs.
 22. A method according to claim 21, wherein said patient is a patient suffering from rheumatoid arthritis.
 23. A method for the treatment of pain and inflammation in a patient suffering from a chronic condition requiring long term administration of an anti-inflammatory compound, comprisingadministering to said patient an amount of amtolmetin guacil effective to control pain and inflammation and simultaneously protect the stomach from gastric secretion, and continuing said administration of amtolmetin guacil over a longer term than a term over which Naproxen, Nimesulide, Piroxicam or Tolmetin can be safely administered. 